I also was thinking about the Singleton asset when I wrote this:
Buy and sell a property on blockchain
In that case it was referred to ownership of real estate, but the concept is the same.
I was then thinking that maybe, using an asset with an amount of units, let’s say 1000, would also be good. 1000 represents the whole property. In the case of real estate it could happen that the property of a person has to be then split amongst more than one in the future, and in that way you can do that when you have a 1000 (in this example) units that represent the totality of the property. If 2 partners buy the property you can share it giving 500 each.
Maybe the same could apply for the collection cards because maybe one day they will be worth a lot and the ownership has to be split amongst more people!
Just a thought… 😉
You need to login in order to like this post: click here